Search:

Loading...

Who's Following:

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Peter Cushing - A Centennial Celebration


A CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION OF MOVIE JOY.
A Dedication and Review of
PETER WILTON CUSHING, OBE. 26th May 1913 – 11th August 1994.
By E.D. Leach.

The Cult Movie Review will now attempt to do justice to one of cinemas great icons... “nay legend” by expressing our delight and gratitude toward his work by writing about not just one of the greatest actors of a certain golden age of cinema but also someone who had a significant personal influence on what is undoubtedly TCMR's favoured movie genre, resulting in we here and doubtless those regular to this site whom I imagine many will also be fans of this great man and his massive canon of genre work. It is also necessary to note before we step forward with this particular review that the following article on completion has been a particular great undertaking on my behalf. As a fan I have attempted with this (mini)-biographical review based upon this individual character who had an astonishing career longevity and formidable movie association and therefore I fear I may be taking on slightly more than one should but because of his personal importance and this being a centenary celebration of his life and work, I should at least attempt to do the right thing in my own usual convoluted way, so without further hesitation...here we go!

Monday, March 18, 2013

The Hunger (1983)

"Nothing human lives forever"

PROLOGUE: A NEW MOOD FOR HORROR. This review is unequivocally dedicated to the recent tragic and sad passing of the late Tony Scott 1944 – 2012. The review is also a specific noting of a changing of the guard in the reinventing and stylising of horror movies for a new age. This review is also a critical rebuke of film critics with no sense of vision or style whatsoever. The Hunger, 1983 is a film that during the time of release showed a dramatic, almost – film noir, slower paced horror movie experience, a film that immediately caught both my attention and imagination when finally viewing it on its eventual video release many distant decades ago now. Despite what many of my friends found as a long winded and arduous, (BORING!) film, for me on a personal level it actually became a pleasant jolt to the system and encompassed a new edginess in filmmaking that fitted perfectly with what this then young adult had began craving as he searched for some kind of genre specific viewing alternative to the usual VHS carousel of recycled horror fair that was being churned out at the time. It was a very overburdened home entertainment marketplace by this time, a time in which most movies available often offered the same old repetitive tedium which at best was 'run of the mill' fair but more oftly were genuinely poor excuses for horror movies of which many titles were now fortunately/unfortunately finally seeing the light of day to a mainstream video viewing audience who were being provided much of said crap by film distributors trying to make quick financial gain often with the release of largely contemptible trite, some of which I have to admit I genuinely loved (still do in fact) but much more of which I truly hated and please guys let us not fool ourselves into thinking that everything controversial, outrageous or gore laden during that period and was available in this horror, Sci-fi or fantasy nirvana was good or interesting entertainment because the truth was a large amount of it was simply disguising a marketing rip off and offering only unadulterated shite, that simple folks! The Hunger came at a time when we were witnessing great change as both our choices and horror tastes began to alter slightly as were the movies now being developed and released during the back end of the 1970's and in the opening salvo of the 1980's.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Suspiria (1977)


 “Once you've seen it you will never again feel safe in the dark”


We will not mess about here. When I first viewed Dario Argento's Suspiria, 1977. I was at the time somewhat underwhelmed by what I believed was a film full of inconsistencies, unintentional comedic clumsiness that the director never intended. I was fourteen going on fifteen and the year was 1981. I was viewing the film with a number of friends so I imagine the nights proceedings would be at times not of a total concentrated full viewing commitment. plus the influence of others being around often as a tendency to distort things at times. This was an evening of horror entertainment which included, Don Coscarelli's Phantasm, 1979 and Lucio Fulci's, Zombie Flesh eaters, 1979. In retrospect and many decades later I am now thinking, “what a night?” The two Italian directed films seemed daft and often silly at the time. Coscarelli's Phantasm being the exception to that rule on that particular night I noted. To those present Phantasm just had a greater kudos, it seemed to connect better with us as an audience of foolish teenagers as compared to both Fulci's gory zombie nonsense and Argento's daft film about a ballet school being a front for a witches coven. Phantasm seemed to defy the two Italian directors horror movie conventions. It was undoubtedly the biggest success of the night for my youthful guests and I alike. I wonder now looking back whether we associated more with the Mike - Michael Baldwin character in Phantasm simply because he was in essence an intense young guy suffering from teenage angst and attempting to commit to what we young teens imagined they could more associate with if thrown in to such a mad world of fighting unexplained metal spheres, monsters and bogeymen. It was all about the opportunity provided to fight the evil of Coscarelli's nightmare creations. Guns, women and fast cars and the opportunity to become the unsung hero, a perfect adolescent formula that suited better. Listen we all loved the madness of our other two features but it was the gore factor of both Argento's work and more so Fulci's mad zombie effort that appealed and little else at the time. It had been word of mouth that had led us to 'Flesh eaters' in particular. This films already growing notoriety had undoubtedly already made an impact on the video viewing public for historical reasons now obvious to those around at the time. In essence this night had represented more the obtaining of a badge of honour. To observe these films was more an initiation, for it was the dawning of the 'nasty' era and often that mattered to a audience of immature lads seeking more than just the fear factor of the films themselves. It was about a bravado and youthful excitement and anticipation that often ruled the head rather than the heart. It was not until roughly several months later that I finally realized both the error of my ways and my distorted judgement on the importance of both Lucio Fulci and more so, Dario Argento as a director and finally facing the realization of how important Suspiria was as a full throttle horror movie experience.
Sunday, August 12, 2012

Martin 1976


MARTIN 1976.
"See it with someone you're sure of..."

The next two reviews that will be discussed on this site come from two of the horror genres greatest ever directors, both whom became close friends, associates and on occasion collaborators over the next several decades. The directors I refer too are one Mr Dario Argento whose masterpiece Suspiria, 1977 will soon take T.C.M.R. limelight. Firstly however we must deal with and now concentrate on Mr George A. Romero's individual masterpiece, Martin 1976, which was eventually given its full cinema release in the summer of July '78. Again many of you may think why start here with this mans illustrious canon of work. The answer is very simple. To date this is still Romero's own personal favourite and extraordinarily his only dip into the vampire genre and what a delve into this particular part of the genre it is. Secondly because his work is so major, nay prolific it is therefore inevitable many of his other works will one day be reviewed on this site. We chose Martin simply because it is a side of this director not often mentioned in formal conversation, (yes because of the zombie thang!) Those with a greater affection and understanding of Romero however still often mention Martin as one of his finest works, so there you have it folks. Not only is this film full of wonderful originality but it is simply a unique and extraordinary movie on many more levels. It shows a pragmatism too frequently absent from this genre and apart from Harry Kümel's wonderful Daughters of Darkness, 1971, or Tony Scott's beautiful and haunting 1983 effort The Hunger and more recently Tomas Alfredson's pretty amazing 2008 contribution, Let The Right One In. These four sublime movies go way beyond the standard way we look at this often over inflated vampire arena. This film also pointed out Romero's greater range when tapped and quite easily puts him in a elite circle of film directors that could quite have easily done far more as a director than they actually became more famous for, though again I have no complaints on what made him world renowned. By the way I should point out now, all the above will be given T.C.M.R. treatment in the near future.

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Xtro


XTRO, 1982
“A brutal excursion in terror”

The reason for originally starting The Cult Movie Review was because of movies such as Harry Bromley Davenport's wonderful movie Xtro, 1982. A low budget British horror movie that many suggest came as a result of New Line Cinemas attempt at trying to capitalise on the favouritism of a growth genre and on the back of the success rate of high profile films such as Ridley Scott's Sci-Fi, horror epic Alien, 1979. The other extreme often referenced is the more family friendly orientated alien creation that is Steven Spielberg's E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial, 1982. The Closest and thinly veiled comparisons with any blockbusters if I was pushed to play such daft games of which many of the critics chose to do at the time then I would go with John Carpenter's The Thing, 1982 or consider Don Segal's original 1956 version of Invasion of The Body Snatchers or even closer comparisons with Phillip Kaufman's 1978 remake the latter one being preferred. Though again we state it is a thinly veiled comparison to make. It was also a film that entered the new video entertainment market which had already gained a pace and most definitely offered the film a second coming before its eventual fall from grace with the film censors but certainly not its newly formed fan base who became very bemused by the BBFC's turn around on the films classification which they had willingly provided originally. Though the film was not outrightly banned it seemed that many video rental outlets worried about its notoriety and were in large unwilling to risk the wrath of a over zealous and often ill equiped police force that seemed intent on taking the new 'nasty' laws to an extreme due process of only their understanding and not that of those trying to make a living in the rental business I am afraid.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Lifeforce

-->
LIFEFORCE 1985.

What are you doing T.C.M.R. I here you cry. Out of all the Tobe Hooper movies you could choose, you choose this film as your first review of his work. Well! is it not obvious? ...No?...Well you should be ashamed. Its blatantly obvious to us that this will not be the only Tobe Hooper film that T.C.M.R. will delve into, as hinted at and by the very suggestion of the words 'first review'. Plus we wanted to review this film anyway so why not start with this exciting title by Tobe Hooper, after all he did direct it and we love this movie, okay...

Lifeforce, 1985 is both quirky and quite grandiose in execution, it also as all the hallmarks of spectacularity and in the main delivers in abundance and is a far superior movie than the box office failure suggest, wrongly in my opinion. It as that adventurous, exciting feel that is infrequently tapped in todays CGI age, it is a traditional 80's special effects extravaganza that at the time broke new and exciting ground in horror. It is also sheer grand scale UK style and no mistake. Yes in parts of the film it shows its age but still its scale and exaggerated storyline are what such things are made of, especially the last twenty minutes when the world seems doomed, it is wonderful and very Quatermass, B – movie related and we here at T.C.M.R. Simply love this recaptured old fashioned atmosphere of thrills and spills that it provides. “I mean Space Vampires for f**k sake?” What is there not to get excited about at such a concept. Why start our relationship with Mr Hooper with the obvious choice that many would make? If you do not know what I am talking about...then go away!

SCHRAMM


SCHRAMM: Into The Mind of a Serial Killer, 1994.

Jörg Buttgereit's Schramm: Into The Mind of a Serial Killer, 1994 is without doubt the most controversial film to hit The Cult Movie Review site thus far as is we must add the films director also. Jörg Buttgereit was born in the old not as yet unified West Berlin, Germany on the 20th December 1963. To this day Jörg Buttgereit is a director of few works since his break through movie Nekromantik way back in 1987. Up until this point Buttgereit had produced only short films and documentary formats but his first main feature and his debut long form production would show the world an uncompromising and at times brutal and most suggest controversial form of both subject matter and direction. The feature storyline of his 1987 movie would immediately court such uncomfortable notoriety by dealing with the subject matter of necrophilia in particular. A deliberate ploy to offend perhaps? Whatever the directors intent it was clear to the film world that Buttgereit would not bow to conventional means and introduced for what most critics saw as a return to the video nasty era of filmmaking.